Mayor Lori Lightfoot on Thursday touted $500,000 the city’s receiving from cafe shipping and delivery enterprise DoorDash to winterize Chicago restaurants, while proposals by aldermen to further more crack down on these kinds of applications through the coronavirus pandemic languish in Metropolis Council committees.
In asserting the grant from the delivery business to assist places to eat prepare for winter season, Lightfoot thanked DoorDash “for investing in Chicago and its restaurants to assist them in continuing to serve Chicagoans this winter season.”
Third-celebration apps this sort of as DoorDash, Grubhub and Uber Eats that demand extra service fees to dining places to supply foods have drawn escalating scrutiny from elected officials because the virus outbreak started, as diners skittish about ingesting inside of dining places have been ordering more to-go foods, fueling a growth for the corporations.
Throughout a May well Metropolis Council committee listening to, battling restaurateurs said the companies charge 30% or additional to deliver foods, and occasionally set up their personal web sites masquerading as these of the dining places themselves.
Northwest Facet Ald. Scott Waguespack, 32nd, launched an ordinance to cap service fees at 5% of the price of the meal, but it bought shunted to the Metropolis Council Principles Committee, in which thoughts the mayor opposes usually get despatched to die.
And although the council did undertake Lightfoot-backed principles requiring supply applications to itemize the fees they demand, stricter bench marks backed by downtown Ald. Brendan Reilly, 42nd, have gone nowhere.
Reilly on Thursday mentioned if the town required to really toss a lifeline to battling restaurants, it would undertake the tougher standards, and the companies would commonly agree to abide by them.
“I’m content to see DoorDash move up and help outdoor eating, but if they genuinely want to support the cafe business, they should really place their cash wherever their mouth is and aid this ordinance,” Reilly explained. “The app firms should really embrace this initiative if they’re actually fascinated in giving relief to Chicago’s having difficulties dining places.”
There’s precedent for a Chicago mayor drawing criticism for not using a tougher line with firms. Through his very first phrase, Mayor Rahm Emanuel caught flak from food policy watchdogs after saying he would contain calorie data on pop machines in city buildings, at a time other mayors have been pulling sugary tender drinks out of equipment in their cities.
Emanuel also unveiled a opposition in between Chicago town staff and individuals in San Antonio to gain rewards from a $5 million national beverage lobbying group.
He later declared Coca-Cola would pay $3 million to fund work out and diet programs as a result of the Chicago Park District to try to battle obesity and diabetic issues, and touted an arrangement with the soft consume giant to fork out $2.59 million for 50,000 blue recycling carts for Chicago households that provided photos of Coke solutions on the lids.
Emanuel also drew the ire of Chicago cabdrivers who stated he favored ride-share firms this sort of Uber — a company that his brother, Hollywood super agent Ari Emanuel, experienced an possession stake in — more than taxis in drawing up Chicago’s experience-share field regulations.
©2020 the Chicago Tribune
Visit the Chicago Tribune at www.chicagotribune.com
Distributed by Tribune Material Agency, LLC.